Author: L.A. Lawrence, Extension Animal Scientist, Horses, Virginia Tech
Publication Number 406-473, July 1996
Introduction |
Maintenance |
Activity |
Feeding Horses
|
Example of One Method of Balancing Horse Rations
|
Deficiency or over abundance of some nutrients can also limit horse performance or production. Balancing the diet of a horse begins with meeting maintenance requirements.
Return to Table of Contents
Individual variation among horses, which may be large, must be considered in applying requirement information to any individual horse. Unlike other livestock, horses have never been selected for feed efficiency or uniformity.
The NRC (1989) has made nutrient requirement calculations for horses easy for those with access to a microcomputer. A computer program calculates the requirements with information based on the age, weight, and activity of the horse. Nutrient Requirements of Horses, including the computer program, can be ordered from National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20418.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to Table of Contents
Formulation of concentrate mixtures depends on the animal's requirements and the portion of the requirements provided by the forage. To determine the portion of the requirement met by hay or pasture, a forage nutrient analysis should be performed by a testing laboratory. Your local county Extension office can recommend a forage testing laboratory. Table 5 shows recommended concentrate to roughage ratios for different classes of horses, Table 7 contains the nutrient contents for the total diet, and Table 8 provides recommended concentrate allowances to be fed with forages. Concentrates fed with alfalfa can be lower in protein, energy, and Ca than those fed with grasses. However, P should be adequate to meet Ca:P ratios. When trying to balance Ca:P, it is important that laboratory analysis for these minerals be used to insure proper supplementation. Calcium and P nutrition requires careful consideration. Calcium availability is 50-75% and P availability is from 25-35% in typical forages. Remember never to get the P higher than the Ca.
Commercially-prepared concentrates are usually balanced for a particular class of horse. Lactating mares, growing horses, and the horse that is working or training hard need to be fed carefully balanced diets. It may be advantageous to use commercial diets for these classes of horses. Commercial diets should be purchased to meet the protein requirements of the particular class of horse being fed. If alfalfa is being fed, choose a supplement balanced to be fed with alfalfa. If grass is being fed, choose a supplement balanced to be fed with grass hay. The crude fiber (CF) content of a grain mix should range between 7-12%; generally, the higher the CF, the lower the energy.
Consistency is a key to good feeding practices. Change individual feeds in the diet slowly over a period of a week. When feeding horses, remember that individual variation is large and the "eye of the master" plays an important role in providing adequate energy.
Adapted from NRC (1989) and E. A. Ott, Dietary Nutrient Allowances for Horses. 1984 Feedstuffs, Vol. 56, No. 30, P. 72.
Return to Table of Contents
Return to Table of Contents
1.5 lb X lb
-------- = ---------
100 lb 1100 lb
(100) = (1.5) 1100 (approximately) [cross multiply]
1650
X = ------ [divide by 100]
100
X = 16.5 lb forage
This establishes that if 1.5 lb is 1.5% of 100 lb, then 16.5 X lbs of forage is 1.5% of 1100 lbs of body weight
A decision is made to use sun-cured alfalfa hay at the mid-bloom stage of maturity. Mid bloom is the stage in which half the plants are in bloom. Using Table 9, find the percentages of nutrients contained in the feedstuff. To make the calculation easier, convert pounds to kilograms at this point. The conversion unit is 1 kg = 2.2 lb.
Again, ratio and proportion can be used to set up a formula to convert 16.5 lb to kg.
6.5
X = ----- [divide by 2.2]
2.2
X = 7.5 kg of alfalfa hay
Next, set up formulas to calculate percentage of nutrients supplied by 7.5 kg of alfalfa.
Digestible Energy of Alfalfa is = 2.07 Mcal/kg
(2.07 Mcal/kg) x 7.5 kg = 15.52 Mcal
Crude Protein = 17% = 17 kg crude protein/100 kg alfalfa
17 kg X kg
-------- = --------
100 kg 7.5 kg
X (100) = 17 (7.5) [cross multiply]
127.5
X = ------- [divide by 100]
100
X = 1.27 kg crude protein/7.5 kg alfalfa
Conversion of kilograms to grams
1 kg = 1000 g
1.27 kg (1000) = 1270 g crude protein/7.5 kg alfalfa
Lysine, calcium and phosphorus are calculated similar to crude protein.
That will be the difference between the nutrients provided by the forage and the nutrition requirements. In this example, the difference will be 9.1 Mcal of energy and 3 g of phosphorus.
Use either a concentrate mixed by a commercial company or a cereal grain such as oats, corn, barley, or a combination. If a commercial product is used, select one that is designed to be fed with alfalfa hay to bring Ca:P ratios in line, thus insuring that proper balance of minerals and vitamins.
Oats will be used for this example. The Digestible energy of oats is 2.91 Mcal/kg. To calculate the amount of oats needed each day, set up the following formula:
9.1 Mcal of Digestible energy is needed.
2.91 Mcal 9.1 Mcal
----------- = ----------
1 kg X kg
X 2.91 = 9.1 (1)
9.1
X = ------
2.91
X = 3.13 kg oats
Convert kg to lb
1 kg 3.13 kg
---------- = ---------
2.21 lb X lb
X (1) = 3.13 (2.2)
X = 6.89
X = 7 lb of oats/day
Calculate additional nutrients supplied by the oats. Evaluate the Ca and P balance. Both Ca and P requirements are met in this ration. This ratio is considered to be in the safe range for mature horses, but to illustrate how to bring the ratio closer to 2:1, a phosphorus supplement will be added. Using Table 10, choose a supplement that supplies P without Ca. Monosodium phosphate is 25.8% P with no calcium. Calculate how much P is needed to provide a 2:1 ratio.
103 g Ca
---------- = 51.5 g P needed
2
52.1 g P needed to get 2:1 ratio
28 g P supplied by diet
23.5 g needed to supplement diet
Monosodium phosphate
25.8 g P 23.5 g P
---------- = ------------------
100 g P X g Monosodium P
X (25.8) = 23.5 (100)
2350
X = ------
25.8
X = 91 g Monosodium P
91 g sodium phosphate
Convert to ounces (1g = 28.3 oz)
1 oz X oz
-------- = ----------
28.3 g 91 g
X (28.3) = 91
X = 3 oz of monosodium phosphate per day
This will provide a 2:1 Ca:P ratio. If a trace-mineral salt mix containing selenium is available and a vitamin supplement is provided, the horse should be receiving a balanced diet.
This example illustrates only one method of balancing rations. There are other methods that can be used for more complex formulations, including computer generated least-cost rations. However, the principles used in this example will be applicable in many situations. Using the text and tables of this publication, many of the typical rations fed to horses can be balanced.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Farm ____________________________________
Animal Type Mature 1100 lb Working Horse
Season Early Spring
Dig. Crude
Amount/day Energy Protein Lysine Ca P
kg lb Mcal g g g g
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirements 24.6 984 34 30 21
Provided by forage
(type) Alfalfa 7.5 16.5
Needed in
grain ration
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grain Ration Amount/day
Ingredients kg lb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oats 3.1 kg 7 9.1 285 10 3 10
Salt 56 g
Vit-Min Premix 56 g
Mono Phos 2.8 g 0.09 0.02 3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total for ration 10.7 23.7 24.6 1560 70 103 51.5
Return to Table of Contents
| Condition | Neck | Whithers | Loin | Tailhead, Pins & Hooks | Ribs | Shoulder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Poor | Bone structure easily noticeable. Animal extremely emaciated, no fatty tissue can be felt. | Bone structure easily noticeable. | Prominent spinous processes. | Tailhead and hooks and pins project prominently. | Ribs project prominently. | Noticeable bone structure on shoulder. |
| 2 Very Thin | Neck faintly discernible. Animal emaciated. | Withers faintly discernible. | Slight fat covering over base of spinous processes. Transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae feel rounded. Spinous processes are prominent. | Tailhead and hooks and pins are prominent. | Ribs prominent. | Shoulder faintly discernible. |
| 3 Thin | Neck accentuated. | Withers accentuated. | Fat built up about halfway on spinous processes. Transverse processes cannot be left. | Tailhead prominent, but individual vertebrae cannot be visually identified. Hook bones appear rounded, but easily discernible. Spinous proccesses easily discernible. Pin bones not distinguishable. | Slight fat cover over ribs. Ribs easily discernible. | Shoulder accentuated. |
| 4 Moderately Thin | Neck not obviously thin. | Withers not obviously thin. | Spinous process (ridge) along back. | Tailhead prominence depends on conformation, fat can be felt around it. Hook bones not discernible. | Faint outline of ribs discernible. | Shoulder not obviously thin. |
| 5 Moderate | Neck blends smoothly into body. | Withers appear rounded over spinous processes. | Back is level. | Fat around tailhead beginning to feel spongy. | Ribs cannot be visually distinguished but can be easily felt. | Shoulder blends smoothly into body. |
| 6 Moderate to Fleshy | Fat beginning to be deposited. | Fat beginning to be deposited. | May have slight crease down back. | Fat around tailhead feels soft. | Fat over ribs feels spongy. | Fat beginning to be deposited. |
| 7 Fleshy | Fat deposited along neck. | Fat deposited along withers. | May have crease down back. | Fat around tailhead feels soft. | Individual ribs can be felt, but noticeable filling between ribs with fat. | Fat deposited behind shoulders. |
| 8 Fat | Noticeable thickening of neck. Fat deposited along inner buttocks. | Area along withers filled with fat. Fat deposited along inner buttoocks. | Crease down back. | Fat around tailhead very soft. | Difficult to palpate ribs. | Area behind shoulder filled in flush. |
| 9 Extremely Fat | Bulging fat. | Bulging fat. | Obvious crease down back. | Bulging fat around tailhead. Fat along inner buttocks may rub together. Flank filled in flush. | Patchy fat appearing over ribs. | Bulging fat. |
Return to Table of Contents
See Figure 1. Condition Score System.
Return to Table of Contents
View this document in PDF Format