Powell River Project Series
Information for the Virginia Coalfields

Conversion of Sericea Lespedeza-Dominant Vegetation to Quality Forages for Livestock Use

Authors: Dennis Dove, Dale Wolf, and Carl Zipper, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech

Publication Number 460-119, posted January 1997

Table of Contents

Introduction A Less Costly Approach
Sericea Lespedeza as a Reclamation Species Management of Converted Stands
Advantages of Conversion Conclusion
Methods for Conversion References
The Importance of Fertilization Acknowledgements

Introduction

Over 50,000 acres in the Virginia coal region were left in "bench and highwall" terrain by surface mining activities which took place prior to 1977. Conditions are similar in the mining regions of eastern Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee. The vegetation established by reclamation practices employed on the majority of these acreages included Sericea lespedeza. This hearty legume, which thrives under low fertility and low soil moisture conditions, is typically found in abundance on these reclaimed mine sites and tends to become the dominant species. Because mature stands of Sericea are relatively unpalatable to livestock during much of the year, land managers with an interest in livestock production often wish to transform Sericea-dominant stands to a more favorable mixture of forages.

The purpose of this publication is to define recommended strategies for converting the Sericea-dominant vegetation typically found on older surface mined benches to more favorable forages that can be more effectively utilized by livestock. Techniques for suppressing the growth of Sericea Lespedeza so as to establish quality forage species and for managing the resultant pasture or hayland area were developed from research conducted at the Powell River Project Education Center site between 1980 and 1987.

Return to Table of Contents


Sericea Lespedeza as a Reclamation Species

Sericea has been a favored species for reclamation plantings in Virginia and neighboring states since the advent of mined land reclamation. Sericea has a long, deep taproot, which is capable of penetrating deep into the overburden to extract soil water that is inaccessible to more shallow rooted species (Figure 1). As a legume, it is able to fix atmospheric nitrogen, and thus survive in low-fertility situations where other non-nitrogen- fixing species are unable to flourish. Another factor which favors Sericea on surface mine benches is the ability to grow vigorously in the summer's hottest months, when other forage species are semi-dormant. However, unlike some of the legumes that are favored for pasture use -- such as alfalfa, red clover, and white clover -- excess nitrogen fixed in plant tissues does not become readily available to companion species in any substantial quantity. Thus, the dominance of the Sericea is not threatened by invading grasses, or other species capable of exploiting such excess organic nitrogen.

Sericea is also able to survive in soil conditions where there are very low levels of soil phosphorus in forms generally considered to be "plant available." The phosphorus requirements of Sericea are very low, compared to those of common forage species. In addition, Sericea is able to utilize soil phosphorus bound in chemical forms that cannot be effectively utilized by other species. These characteristics enable Sericea to thrive on many older surface mine benches, especially where available soil phosphorus levels are low because of the high phosphorus fixation capacities of many minesoils.

Sericea's growth cycle begins in late spring, when it sends up new shoots from the "crown" which occurs where the root mass comes together, just below the soil surface. As this new shoot growth comes up, it draws on the nonstructural carbohydrate energy reserves stored in the fleshy taproot from the previous year's growth (Figure 2). The maximum rate of growth occurs during the June-July period, after which shoot growth begins to decrease. Then, the plant begins to route the majority of the nutrient reserves generated through photosynthesis back into the taproot for winter storage. In late summer (early September) Sericea begins to flower, stemminess increases as does the tannin content in the plant leaves. Tannins are plant compounds similar to those found in unripe fruit which render Sericea unpalatable to livestock and may act to bind plant protein in the animal's gut. This effectively reduces the already low nutritional value of the Sericea forage. As fall turns to winter, the above ground growth turns into woody biomass that is high in tannins and unpalatable to most forms of livestock. In succeeding years, this biomass, which decomposes very slowly, begins to build up on the soil surface, suppressing the growth of competing species. The dead, standing biomass often becomes a thicket that is difficult to penetrate on foot.

Sericea vegetation is moderately palatable to livestock only during a brief portion of the year -- the late spring-early summer period of rapid growth. During that time, cattle prefer the emergent portion of the shoots to many other foods that are available in a typical, unmanaged, reclaimed mine pasture. During the remaining portion of the year, cattle will eat the Sericea as a last resort, when all other food sources have been consumed. Since the nutritional value and palatability of this forage is low, cattle may not achieve optimum weight gains even though given access to large areas of pasture. The resultant low potential live weight gains adversely affect the cattle producers' goal for more efficient livestock production.

Return to Table of Contents


Advantages of Conversion

The major advantage of converting a Sericea-dominated stand to more desirable forage species is an improved pasture. It will take fewer acres to support each cow and the livestock will put on weight more rapidly if they are grazing a high quality, nutritious forage. Reducing each animal's acreage requirement will, as a consequence, reduce fencing and other management costs, or increase the number of animals that can be stocked on a given acreage. These benefits, of course, are balanced by the cost of implementing a conversion strategy. Thus, the desirability of implementing this conversion strategy will vary. Generally, the greater the productive capacity of an individual site, the greater the productivity increase that can be expected from implementing a conversion strategy.

Return to Table of Contents


Methods for Conversion

Outlined below is a two-year program designed to suppress Sericea and introduce an improved pasture species mix.

June-July, Year 1: Suppress the stand of Sericea Lespedeza. This can be accomplished by grazing or mowing the stand to the ground, or by applying a suitable herbicide. Producers should obtain and use current approved herbicides and rates of applications for their area. These can be obtained from local extension offices. This should be done during the period of maximum shoot growth, which will cut down on the amount of nutrient reserves that can be sent to the crown for re-growth the following spring. Once all the leaves have been removed, the plant is unable to generate carbohydrate reserves by photosynthesis for storage in the taproot and other fleshly roots.

Fall (late September - early October), Year 1: The first step in fall management will be to mow the Sericea close to the ground or burn the area. The mowing should be followed by a light disking, if possible. Both activities should precede application of fertilizer and seed, as required to establish an annual cover crop.

Fertilization rates should be determined by a soil test. If the test is to be conducted by the Virginia Tech soil testing lab, the box should be plainly marked as containing either a "minesoil" (i.e., blasted overburden; topsoil substitute) or a recycled topsoil, as appropriate, to assure that appropriate soil testing procedures are utilized. Those unfamiliar with soil testing procedures should contact their local extension agent for details on how to sample, where to send the sample, and how to interpret the results. Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) are the primary fertilizer nutrients to be applied at this time.

A cover crop of a rapidly growing, annual species could be sown to establish organic matter in the soil (Table 1). This crop will take up nutrients that have been applied by fertilization. When these plants are deposited on the soil as litter, nutrients are released and recycled to the roots of other plants growing in the area. The primary purpose for the cover crop -- aside from holding the soil in place -- is to take up as many fertilizer nutrients as possible into the above-ground biomass tissue.

Table 1. Recommended fall cover crop species and seeding rates.

Common
Name
Scientific
Name
Seeding
rate (lb/a)
Crimson CloverTrifolium incarnatum20-25
Winter OatsAvena sativa60-80
RyeSecale cereale90-100
Annual RyegrassLolium multiflorum20-30

The cover crop should include both grass and legume components. Grasses to be considered are annual rye grass, cereal rye or winter oats, wheat or barley. The purpose of the legume species (such as red or crimson clover, or hairy vetch) is to fix atmospheric nitrogen for recycling to next year's vegetation and to provide a more balanced forage for grazing animals.

The fall seeding can be accomplished by broadcasting seed into the Sericea stubble.

Spring (April or May), Year 2: The cover crop should be removed by a close grazing or a mechanical cutting. Remnants of the Sericea stand will generally shoot up at this time. The cover crop can be harvested for hay or straw, or mowed and allowed to remain as mulch.

June - July, Year 2: Suppress the Sericea stand again, as during the previous year.

Fall, Year 2: Fertilize, and establish desired pasture species. Suitable species are listed in Table 2. P and K fertilizer should be applied at rates consistent with the results of a soil test. It is vital to establish one or more legume species if the pasture is to be a self-sustaining source of nutritious forage. Hence, the soil test should also check the levels of micronutrients necessary for the planned legume species. Lime should also be applied if the soil test shows a need to raise soil pH. Once again, seed can be broadcast into the Sericea stubble.

Table 2. Recommended fertility levels and soil pH's for various pasture species


Species

Legume
Soil
pH
P Fertility
Requirement*
(lbs./A)
K Fertility
Requirement*
(lbs./A)
Seeding
Rate
(lbs./A)
Alfalfayes6.5-7.0110-140110-14010-15
White Cloveryes6.0-6.590-12060-901-2
Red Cloveryes6.0-6.590-12060-904-6
Annual Lespedezayes5.8-6.260-9030-6015-20
Tall Fescueno5.6-6.290-12090-120 20-30
Rye Grassno5.8-6.230-5030-5010-15
Switchgrassno5.8-6.275-10075-1004-6
Sweet Cloveryes6.5-7.040-7050-8015
Birdsfoot Trefoilyes6.0-6.540-7050-804-5
*Fertilization rates required to achieve these fertility levels should be determined based upon the results of a soil test.

Return to Table of Contents


The Importance of Fertilization

The most expensive part of the recommended conversion procedure will be the fertilization required to establish a viable pasture.

Typically, both P and K fertilizer will be necessary to bring the minesoil up to a high fertility level. Liming will also be desirable in some situations, as soil pH should be at least 5.7. The potential productivity of the soil will be a key determinant of the economic benefit of fertilizer and lime expenditures. In general, it will only make good economic sense to invest in fertilization and/or liming on soils where productivity is not limited by physical factors, such as heavy compaction and/or shallowness to bedrock. As a general rule if the Sericea and associated vegetation are not thriving on a particular area, it will not make economic sense to invest in fertilization and liming.

Fertilization and liming are vital components of the conversion process for a number of reasons. First, low fertility (especially low P) favors Sericea over other legume species, since Sericea is well adapted to low P conditions. Secondly, most agronomic legume species do best at moderate pH, high soil fertility conditions. If these conditions are not established, then the agronomic legumes will not thrive. A healthy legume species is vital to any forage crop production system.

Return to Table of Contents


A Less Costly Approach

Many reclaimed areas can be improved as forage production areas simply by reducing the Sericea component of the vegetation mix. Although Sericea tends to dominate old strip benches, it rarely dominates to the extent of eliminating other species. Sericea was often sown with tall fescue, which is a hearty competitor in its own right. Such a vegetation mix can be improved as a forage/pasture production system simply by increasing the fescue component of the vegetative mix and adding a second legume.

However, both Sericea and tall fescue suffer from the problem that their digestibility is reduced in late summer, so from an animal management standpoint, this lower cost option may not be as desirable as converting the existing vegetation to a more typical agronomic forage crop mix.

Where tall fescue is present in small quantities, the fescue component can be increased at the expense of the Sericea by keeping the pasture closely grazed or mowed during the May-June-July portion of the year. The area should be fertilized with as much P as the owner can afford, up to the recommended level from the soil test. If possible, an alternative legume should be established, with the objective of supplementing the forage protein content during times when Sericea and fescue are both low in nutritional value. Recommended legumes for these situations are ladino clover, red clover, and annual lespedeza.

Return to Table of Contents


Management of Converted Stands

Key components of the management strategy must be to:

  1. Maintain soil fertility and pH sufficient to maintain the non-Sericea legume components of forage mix.

  2. Keep the stand grazed or cut, especially in late spring or early summer. Do not allow Sericea to go through critical June-July period into maximum TNC storage without close grazing or cutting.

Return to Table of Contents


Conclusion

The experience of numerous people in raising livestock on surface mined lands in Virginia and neighboring states has shown that cattle can thrive on mined lands when pastures are properly managed. This publication provides guidelines for converting the Sericea-dominated vegetation stands typically found on older surface mining sites to more favorable forage species, and for managing those pastures.

Return to Table of Contents


References

Dove, Dennis. 1985. Dry Matter and Nutrient Loss from Legume Litter Grown on Mine Soils. M.S. Thesis, Department of Agronomy, Virginia Tech.

Return to Table of Contents


Acknowledgements

Many thanks to John Ball for his assistance with the field plots and to John Gerken for editorial suggestions.

Return to Table of Contents

Visit Virginia Cooperative Extension