Publication Number 410-027, October 2003
Figure 1 The life cycle of a typical stomach worm.
After larvae have developed into the stage where they are infective, they must be eaten by the sheep in order to complete their life-cycle. The larvae have a limited ability to transport themselves from the manure onto the pasture plants. Therefore, continuation of the cycle depends on disintegration of manure during rains, which transports larvae in splashes and small currents to the surrounding grasses. When sheep are forced to graze pastures very closely, the number of larvae ingested usually increases because the concentration of larvae is higher in the lower parts of pasture plants. The fact that sheep naturally tend to graze selected areas of the pasture very closely, even when other pasture is available, is one of the characteristics that makes them so susceptible to worms.
Once the larvae are eaten, they must continue the development process before becoming adults and being able to lay eggs. This requires a very specific time period; about 14 days in the case of Haemonchus contortus. For Ostertagia and Trichostrongylus, it takes approximately 21 days of development after being eaten before the mature worm is able to produce eggs. These specific periods of time become important when strategic parasite control programs are initiated.
A factor that has important implications in the parasite life cycle is the discovery that stomach worms have the ability to go through a stage of arrested development (hypobiosis). Hypobiosis means that some of the larvae consumed by the sheep go into a dormant state instead of continuing their development. This allows them to get through periods of adverse climatic conditions for larval development and survival in the environment. This occurs in our area in the winter. These hypobiotic larvae accumulate and may reach large numbers. They may also be protected from some dewormers that are not effective against this stage of the parasite. In the spring or at lambing, a sudden resumption of their development to adult worms may occur and result in an increase in egg shedding onto the pasture and occasional disease signs in the sheep.
The damage caused by the parasite in the sheep is related to two factors. First, the developing larvae damage the gland cells of the stomach, which produces a disturbance of the digestive process. The second way that damage occurs is specific to Haemonchus. Haemonchus is a ravenous blood-sucker and removes considerable quantities of blood from the sheep. Blood loss can rapidly become greater than the animal is able to replace, resulting in anemia (a low blood cell level). Anemia may become so severe that animals are unable to transport adequate oxygen to tissues, resulting in the death of the animal.
Diarrhea may or may not occur as a result of parasitism. Diarrhea results from intestinal irritation and from disturbed digestion of food. Infections with Haemonchus very rarely result in diarrhea. The other worm species are more likely to cause diarrhea.
By the time symptoms appear, significant damage has already occurred, and prompt action is necessary to prevent further loss.
Many of the symptoms mentioned are also symptoms of other diseases. Therefore, it is wise to consult a veterinarian in order to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. Only after an accurate diagnosis is made can an effective treatment and control program be undertaken.
In addition to the examination of feces for parasite eggs, pasture grass may be examined to determine approximate levels of pasture contamination, and total parasite counts can be obtained from an autopsy.
As the lush grass growth of spring proceeds and grazing begins, the over-wintered larvae are picked up by grazing animals. The number of over-wintered larvae on grass tends to decrease during the spring season due to increased temperature and sunlight, which kill larvae. If sunny, dry conditions prevail, larvae numbers may decline dramatically. Larvae eaten by sheep as they begin the grazing season go through the two-week development and begin to produce eggs. Since one larva can result in an adult that produces thousands and thousands of eggs, a multiplication in parasite numbers occurs. This is particularly true if moist, warm weather conditions are favorable to the development of larvae from eggs.
From mid-summer on, if weather conditions are appropriate, a large number of larvae accumulate on the pasture. This is referred to as the "midsummer explosion" in larval numbers. Depending on weather conditions, these larval numbers may remain high on pastures for the balance of the grazing season. If hot, dry weather conditions prevail, larval numbers will decrease due to the killing effect of drying. Figure 2 is a graph of typical numbers of larvae on the pasture during the grazing season.
Figure 2. Relative numbers of infective worm larvae on pastures during the grazing season for years with normal rainfall and for dry summers.
A phenomena called the periparturient (meaning around lambing time) egg rise must also be considered in parasite control programs. Beginning about two weeks before lambing, and continuing up to eight weeks after lambing, the ewe has a reduced ability to deal with worms. This process occurs regardless of when during the year lambing takes place and results in decreased ability to prevent development of incoming larvae, expel worms, and inhibit egg production by parasites already present in the stomach. These parasites produce large numbers of eggs that are shed in the manure. This is evidently a mechanism by which the parasite ensures the infection of the new generation of sheep about to be born. Effective parasite control programs must prevent this contamination of the surroundings into which very susceptible lambs will be born.
Many control programs used in the past, although well intentioned, resulted in the sheep having only a few days without worms before the process of reinfection began. Sheep quickly returned to worm burdens of essentially pretreatment levels. This resulted because the treatment programs did not stop the pasture contamination buildup; and therefore, sheep were dewormed and returned to very heavily contaminated pastures. Effective control programs should, therefore, combine the preventive use of dewormers with appropriate grazing management.
The required intensity of a parasite control program will be determined by the management on the farm. The two biggest management factors affecting this are stocking density and season of lambing. With low stocking rates, much less control is needed. If lambing and weaning occur such that young lambs are not grazing from midsummer on, then the intensity of the parasite control program may be greatly decreased.
If a flock is moved to a safe pasture after treatment, it may enjoy several weeks of low worm burdens rather than only two or three days as the result of treatment alone. A safe pasture should not be grazed by infected sheep; they must be treated before being allowed to graze. This treatment serves two purposes: 1) it removes the potentially harmful worm burden in the sheep, and 2) it protects the safe pasture from new contamination.
One control program is based on a concept termed "dose- and-move." The rationale behind this is to extend the effectiveness of a single treatment by moving animals to a safe pasture to limit reinfection. Thus, if sheep are treated in early June and moved to a safe pasture, they are unlikely to be exposed to the summer explosion in pasture infectivity. If sheep are treated and left on the same pasture, however, they will be exposed to heavy reinfection and derive little benefit from the treatment. Systems may be used where one portion of a pasture is used for grazing during the early part of the grazing season, while the other portion of the pasture is used to grow hay. After the hay is harvested and some regrowth has occurred in early June, sheep are dewormed, moved to the pasture from which hay has been harvested, and the contaminated pasture is allowed to grow hay during the latter part of the grazing season. The process of drying involved in hay making kills infective larvae on these plants so that this hay may safely be fed to sheep during the winter. Because some build-up often occurs late in the grazing season when move-and-dose is being practiced, two additional fall (September/October) dewormings should be given two weeks apart.
Following this initial treatment, several approaches can be taken. Sheep may be retreated with an effective dewormer every two weeks for several treatments. However, it is important to realize that treatment at two-week intervals can rapidly lead to the development of drug resistant parasites. Such a situation has developed in Australia, where some strains of Haemonchus are resistant to almost every anthelmintic available. The two-week treatment intervals prevent any worms from developing to the point that their eggs are passed in the manure. If a product with a residual effect (that is, a product where the product persists in the animal and continues to kill incoming larvae)is used, the treatment can be extended by the number of days of the residual effect. If weather conditions become dry during midsummer, deworming may be discontinued for a time. Remember that pasture larvae levels rebound quickly after a rain, so deworming should be immediately resumed if midsummer or fall rains come.
For these programs to be effective, it is essential to include all sheep. Mature ewes, any lambs over a few weeks of age, rams, and replacements must all be de-wormed. Leaving a few untreated sheep mixed with sheep on the program may allow for enough parasite build-up over a period of weeks and months to destroy the entire earlier efforts.
An alternative program used by many producers involves monthly treatments throughout the grazing season. This program will probably fail in severe parasite years because the long interval between treatments allows reinfection and egg laying by the worms.
Table 1. Dewormer Products Approved and Under Development for Sheep
| Approved Products | Products Under Development | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generic Names | Levamisole | Thiabendazole | Ivermectin | Fenbendazole | Morantel | Albendazole tartrate |
| Trade Names | Levasole, Tramisol, Prohibit | Equizole Suspension | Ivomec Sheep Drench | Panacur, Safe-Guard | Rumatel | Valbazen |
| Manufacturer | Malinckrodt, AgriLabs | Merck-Agvet | Merck-Agvet | Hoechst-Roussel | Pfizer | Smith-Kline Beecham |
| Dosage Forms | Drench, bolus | Drench, bolus, paste, feed pre-mix & top dress | Drench (injectable not FDA approved) paste | Drench, paste, feed block | Bolus, feed pre-mix | Drench |
| Parasites | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control | Control |
| Haemonchus Adults Young (immature) |
All Most |
All Most |
All All |
All All |
All Most |
All All |
| Ostertagia Adults Young(immature) |
All Some |
All Few |
All All |
All All |
All Few |
All All |
| T. Colubri formis Adults Young (immature) |
All All |
All All |
All All |
All All |
All All |
All All |
| Lung worms | All | Few | All | All | None | all |
| Tapeworms | None | None | None | Most | All | all |
| Comments | Some documented resistance in the U.S. | Effective against nasal bots. Some external parasite control (sucking, lice, ticks, keds) | Cross resistance with thiabendazole | |||
Pre-lambing treatment is critical in a parasite control program and should be administered approximately two weeks before ewes lamb, thus preventing the contamination from the periparturient egg rise. This can conveniently be done when ewes are bagged prior to lambing or coupled with vaccination or crutching procedures. Waiting until lambing has occurred, or until ewes are turned out of the lambing barn with their lambs, results in considerable contamination of the environment prior to the treatment. If prelambing deworming is not possible, ewes can be dewormed at lambing and moved to safe pastures. It is important that animals be treated with a dewormer that is effective against hypobiotic larvae. Levamisole and ivermectin are approved products which have that ability. Thiabendazole does not remove hypobiotic larvae when given at approved dosages.
Sheep kept in dry lots do not pick up larvae from grazing and need only be dewormed when moved from pasture to dry lot.
When winter lambing is practiced so that young lambs never graze, less strenuous control programs may be practiced. This is because all grazers have greater age and have acquired immunity. Pre-lambing deworming should still be practiced. Remember that young replacements must be grazed separately and given an effective parasite control program. Sheep imported from arid areas will usually be quite susceptible to parasites and will require an intensive control program.
Four techniques have been suggested for reducing the development of resistance: 1) Use a full dose of dewormer whenever treatment is done, 2) Reduce dosing frequency by decreasing stocking rates or use dose-and- move. 3) Treat all new introductions with the best products available and perhaps with a double dose. 4) Avoid alternating dewormers during the grazing season. Alternating dewormers between seasons may be advisable.
Table 1 contains a list of dewormer products approved for use in sheep, and three drugs currently available for cattle and under development for use in sheep. The table provides information concerning trade names, manufacturers, dosage forms, and effectiveness of dewormers against the various important sheep parasites.
Although injectable ivermectin is not approved for sheep, it will keep numbers of parasite eggs low in the feces for three weeks after treatment compared to only two weeks when the drench product is used. The drench ivermectin product is approved for use in sheep but does not have as great a residual effect. Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum, safe dewormer that is highly efficient against all worm stages, including hypobiotic larvae. In addition, ivermectin will provide control of nasal bots and has varying efficacy against external parasites like lice, keds, and ticks.
If a lamb is infected with a sufficient number of oocysts, the damage to cells in the gut wall may be extensive. This results in watery diarrhea, occasionally containing blood and mucus. Dehydration and weight loss often occur. If the condition is left untreated, lambs may die. Lambs surviving clinical disease will have their growth potential severely compromised. Coccidiosis can be diagnosed in a live animal by clinical signs and demonstrations of large numbers of oocysts in feces.
The administration of anticoccidial drugs before anticipated outbreaks can significantly reduce or eliminate clinical outbreaks of coccidiosis in sheep. Products containing the following anticoccidial drugs are commercially available : lasalocid, monensin, decoquinate and sulfaquinoxaline. Table 2 summarizes commercial product names and dosage levels. If clinical coccidiosis develops in a flock, sulfa antibiotics or amprolium may be prescribed by a veterinarian under the extra-label drug provisions since no product is approved to treat clinical coccidiosis.
Table 2. Products providing control for coccidia approved for use in sheep and other small ruminants.
| Approved Products | Products approved for other small ruminants | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generic Names | Lasalocid | Sulfaquinoxaline | Decoquinate | Monensin |
| Trade Names | Bovatec | Purina Sulfa-Nox | Deccox | Rumensin 80 |
| Manufacturer | Hoffman-La Roche | Purina Mills | Rhone-Poulenc | Elanco |
| Dosage Forms | 15 % Medicated premix : Commercially available feeds, mineral packages and supplements | 3.44% Liquid Water Additive | 6% Feed Additive Commercially available feeds, mineral packages and supplements | Commercially available feeds and premixes |
| Dosage Rate | 15 to 70 mg/hd/day for prevention of coccidiosis in sheep | 0.015% water mix for 3 to 5 days for control of coccidiosis in sheep | 22.7 mg/lb daily for prevention of coccidiosis in young goats. Feed for at least 28 days. | 20 gm per ton of feed for prevention of coccidiosis in confined, fed, non-lactating goats |
Trade names are used in this publication for information purposes only. Virginia Cooperation Extension, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, and Virginia State University do not warrant those mentioned nor do they intend or imply discrimination against those not mentioned.
View this document in PDF format